DNA can be used to determine whether a person is guilty or innocent in majority of the cases that come about in the criminal systems. Still today, the flaws in that system has caused many innocent people their lives and the guilty set free. But what I don't understand is that if DNA has the power to answer the question of whether a person is innocent or guilty, why is it not always used. What's the problem. Some would argue costs, yeah that could be an issue, but wouldn't it cost the government more to pay the wrongly convicted for the years that they spent in jail?
Kiara L. Hall
CPO 2001
T R 1:05
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment