When things came into to play, who they are doesn't matter...the factor that is of importance is what they have done while in office and what they feel is best for our nation. Some have more experience while others have more popularity and not much experience.
With our country in such economic and political division and with such "strong" foreign problems, I am looking for who can best "parent" our country at this time.
Isn't that what they are, our parent? When we need something we ask for it (ie welfare)....when we are in trouble (ie Katrina) don't we wait for them to bail us out? (whether they did it the right way or not)
Who is the better parent here?
With Iraq, Iran, Samolia, Korea, and the countless problems on the home front who is going to continue "raise" this country to best fit us and solve our problems?
Carina ... AKA 1bucfan
1 comment:
The best "parent" in my opinion is John Edwards...he has the political experience and the popularity to get elected, and I believe that once he is in office he will be able to:
- stabilize our otherwise shaky economy
- develop and carry out a strategy to get troops out of Iraq
- and bring a heavily divided country back together, which may end up being his greatest accomplishment.
If Obama runs as his VP (hes well liked by the people that actually know of him - just not experienced enough to win the primary) they would be pretty much unstoppable.
Post a Comment